Update on Secondary Facelift Surgery

Published:March 17, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yacs.2021.01.015
      Patients presenting for secondary facelift are generally older than their primary facelift counterparts, amplifying the need for a thorough medical history.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Advances in Cosmetic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sundine M.J.
        • Kretsis V.
        • Connell B.F.
        Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 229-237
        • Rasko Y.M.
        • Beale E.
        • Rohrich R.J.
        Secondary rhytidectomy: comprehensive review and current concepts.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 1370-1378
        • Guyuron B.
        • Bokhari F.
        • Thomas T.
        Secondary rhytidectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1281-1284
        • Beale E.W.
        • Rasko Y.
        • Rohrich R.J.
        A 20-year experience with secondary rhytidectomy: a review of technique, longevity, and outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 625-634
        • Matarasso A.
        • Wallach S.G.
        • Difrancesco L.
        • et al.
        Age-based comparisons of patients undergoing secondary rhytidectomy.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2002; 22: 526-530
        • Guyuron B.
        Secondary rhytidectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 797-800
        • Hatef D.A.
        • Sclafani A.P.
        Secondary rhytidectomy.
        Semin Plast Surg. 2009; 23: 257-263
        • Funk E.
        • Adamson P.A.
        A comparison of primary and secondary rhytidectomy results.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35: 96-99
        • Hamra S.T.
        Frequent face lift sequelae: hollow eyes and the lateral sweep: cause and repair.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 1658-1666
        • Hamra S.T.
        Prevention and correction of the "face-lifted" appearance.
        Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 16: 215-229
        • Hamra S.T.
        Correcting the unfavorable outcomes following facelift surgery.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2001; 28: 621-638
        • Ramirez O.M.
        • Pozner J.N.
        Subperiosteal endoscopic techniques in secondary rhytidectomy.
        Aesthet Surg J. 1997; 17: 22-26
        • Momeni M.
        • Hafezi F.
        • Rahbar H.
        • et al.
        Effects of silicone gel on burn scars.
        Burns. 2009; 35: 70-74
        • Janis J.E.
        • Harrison B.
        Wound healing: part II. Clinical applications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 383e-392e
        • Khansa I.
        • Harrison B.
        • Janis J.E.
        Evidence-based scar management: how to improve results with technique and technology.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 165S-178S
        • Hultman C.S.
        • Edkins R.E.
        • Wu C.
        • et al.
        Prospective, before-after cohort study to assess the efficacy of laser therapy on hypertrophic burn scars.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70: 521-526
        • Kim D.H.
        • Ryu H.J.
        • Choi J.E.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the scar prevention effect between carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser in surgical scars.
        Dermatol Surg. 2014; 40: 973-978
        • Jones B.
        • Grover R.
        Avoiding hematoma in cervicofacial rhytidectomy: a personal 8-year quest. Reviewing 910 patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 381-387
        • Uebel C.O.
        Correcting hairline deformities after facial rejuvenation.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2007; 27: 459-465
        • Mowlavi A.
        • Meldrum D.G.
        • Wilhelmi B.J.
        • et al.
        The “pixie” ear deformity following face lift surgery revisited.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1165-1171
        • Mowlavi A.
        • Zakhireh M.
        Avoiding the “pixie-ear” deformity following face lift surgery by differential insetting and secondary intention healing.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2005; 25: 467-470
        • Laurence V.G.
        • Wirth G.A.
        • Michaud J.P.
        • et al.
        Surgical correction of pixie-ear defect without an exposed incision on the lobe.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 68: 360-361
        • Mendelson B.C.
        Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107 ([discussion: 1553–5, 1556–7, 1558–61]): 1545-1552
        • Mendelson B.C.
        • Tutino R.
        Submandibular gland reduction in aesthetic surgery of the neck: review of 112 consecutive cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136: 463-471
        • Lambros V.
        • Stuzin J.M.
        The cross-cheek depression: surgical cause and effect in the development of the "joker line" and its treatment.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 1543-1552
        • Narasimhan K.
        • Ramanadham S.
        • O'Reilly E.
        • et al.
        Secondary neck lift and the importance of midline platysmaplasty: review of 101 cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137: 667e-675e
        • Matarasso A.
        Managing the components of the aging neck: from liposuction to submentalplasty, to neck lift.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41: 85-98
        • Singer D.P.
        • Sullivan P.K.
        Submandibular gland I: an anatomic evaluation and surgical approach to submandibular gland resection for facial rejuvenation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112 ([discussion: 1155]): 1150-1154
        • Reinisch J.F.
        • Bresnick S.D.
        • Walker J.W.
        • et al.
        Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus after face lift: a study of incidence and prophylaxis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1570-1575
        • Chopan M.
        • Samant S.
        • Mast B.A.
        Contemporary analysis of rhytidectomy using the tracking operations and outcomes for plastic surgeons database with 13,346 patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 1402-1408